What the product does
An athlete provides the bout context and footage. The analysis workflow proposes moments to inspect; a human reviewer checks timing, score, action labels and uncertainty before a report is published privately to the athlete. Findings should lead back to confirmed evidence. Training suggestions are a starting point for discussion with the athlete’s coach.
Scope and limits
The current public demo focuses on men’s épée. Demo names, accounts, events and reports are fictional; they are examples of the interface and report format, not customer testimonials or performance results. For other weapons or unusual footage, describe the recording in a trial request so its suitability can be considered. A video review does not replace official refereeing, an individual coach or an athlete’s own account of the bout.
How we write the public guides
Guides are published under the FencerLens name with a visible update date. We distinguish visible observations from interpretations and mark worked examples as fictional. Rule and event references link to federation or organiser sources where relevant; readers should verify the applicable current version. Practical review frameworks explain what to record and what cannot be concluded from limited footage. We do not present example counts as research findings or promise a ranking or athletic result.
Privacy and correction requests
Public sample reports contain fictional information. Athlete footage and reports belong in the private account workflow. Optional website analytics runs only after consent on eligible public pages. For a correction to a public guide, email the page URL, the statement in question and an authoritative source where available. Avoid including private athlete footage in a public comment.
Start with one bout
You can use the public guides and free tools before requesting a trial. The trial form asks about your needs; it does not require a video upload.
Request a trial →