← Back to homeFictional example · No real customer data

FENCING ANALYSIS REPORT · SAMPLE

Athlete A vs. Athlete B

Epee training bout／Athlete A: left of frame／Illustrative short bout: 0:0 → 5:4

From your question to each touch—and what to train next.Illustration, not a real assessment

Reconstruct the timelineConnect the score, timestamp and action Understand every touchReview scoring, conceded and double touches See the performance profileTrace strengths and adjustments to specific actions

Answering your uploaded question

Athlete A's question · Example

Why do I keep losing my lead despite taking the initiative? How should I respond to sustained forward pressure?

In this illustrative short bout, the issue is not an inability to attack. Decisions arrive late in two situations: choosing between more distance and blade control after the first retreat, and continuing pursuit after the attacking window has closed.

Blade control before finishing in action 4, and early retreat followed by a reply in action 7, suggest two adjustments: recognise the threat before choosing how to finish.

View action 4 ↗View action 7 ↗

Scoring timeline

Follow the score to understand the bout.

A: 3 single lights · B: 2 single lights · 2 doubles

Score order: Athlete A : Athlete B · All times and actions are illustrative
No.	Video time	Score	Action or event
Start	00:00	0:0	Illustrative short bout begins
01 ↗	00:18–00:21	0:0 → 1:0	Draw a reaction, then attack the preparationScored
02 ↗	00:43–00:46	1:0 → 1:1	A late second retreat compresses defensive spaceConceded
03 ↗	01:12–01:15	1:1 → 2:2	Entering without addressing the point in lineDouble touch
04 ↗	01:44–01:47	2:2 → 3:2	Blade control changes a double-touch situationScored
05 ↗	02:18–02:21	3:2 → 3:3	An extra pursuit step misses the first windowConceded
06 ↗	02:52–02:55	3:3 → 4:4	Simultaneous finishes without a timing advantageDouble touch
07 ↗	03:26–03:29	4:4 → 5:4	Read the pressure, control distance, then finishScored

In-depth touch-by-touch review

Every touch: the action, the interpretation, the next step.

Draw a reaction, then attack the preparation

00:18–00:21 · Scored

1:0

Evidence frame

In an actual report, this area shows a frame from the corresponding bout video.

Each frame corresponds to this action's timestamp and analysis.

What happened

A draws B's retreat with a half-step, then finishes with a direct thrust as B steps forward again, before B establishes a threat. A scores a single light.

Technical interpretation

The key is not simply moving faster: A changes the opponent's rhythm before choosing when to enter distance.

Keep or adjust

Keep the half-step probe and commit after recognising the opponent's renewed forward step.

A late second retreat compresses defensive space

00:43–00:46 · Conceded

1:1

Evidence frame

In an actual report, this area shows a frame from the corresponding bout video.

Each frame corresponds to this action's timestamp and analysis.

What happened

B keeps pressing. After the first retreat, A remains within reach and starts the second retreat late. A attempts a defence at close distance; B scores a single light.

Technical interpretation

The defensive choice comes after distance has already closed, leaving too little time for blade control or an exit.

Keep or adjust

Decide after the first retreat whether to continue opening distance, rather than waiting until the opponent is close.

Entering without addressing the point in line

01:12–01:15 · Double touch

2:2

Evidence frame

In an actual report, this area shows a frame from the corresponding bout video.

Each frame corresponds to this action's timestamp and analysis.

What happened

A presses and attacks directly. B keeps the point in line and counterattacks; both hit within the scoring interval.

Technical interpretation

A finds the target but enters along a line exposed to B's point. Finishing an attack does not necessarily produce a single light.

Keep or adjust

Read the opponent's point first: address the blade when it is in line, and finish directly when it is off line.

Blade control changes a double-touch situation

01:44–01:47 · Scored

3:2

Evidence frame

In an actual report, this area shows a frame from the corresponding bout video.

Each frame corresponds to this action's timestamp and analysis.

What happened

A probes with another half-step. With B's point still in line, A beats the blade to change the line before finishing for a single light.

Technical interpretation

Unlike action 3, A deals with the immediate threat before finishing, changing the conditions for scoring.

Keep or adjust

Keep the sequence: recognise the point position, then choose the finish.

An extra pursuit step misses the first window

02:18–02:21 · Conceded

3:3

Evidence frame

In an actual report, this area shows a frame from the corresponding bout video.

Each frame corresponds to this action's timestamp and analysis.

What happened

B changes rhythm while retreating. A does not finish the first advance and adds another preparation step. B counterattacks as A's weight moves forward, scoring a single light.

Technical interpretation

The issue is not a slow start. A neither finishes nor exits promptly after entering, giving B time to counterattack.

Keep or adjust

Define the end of each entry: if the window closes, recover distance instead of continuing the chase.

Simultaneous finishes without a timing advantage

02:52–02:55 · Double touch

4:4

Evidence frame

In an actual report, this area shows a frame from the corresponding bout video.

Each frame corresponds to this action's timestamp and analysis.

What happened

After probing at medium distance, both enter together. A and B continue their attacks, resulting in a double touch.

Technical interpretation

Neither fencer first draws a clear reaction. Both rely on finishing at the same time, without establishing a timing advantage.

Keep or adjust

At a tied score, establish a recognisable trigger rather than relying on simultaneous starts to produce a single light.

Read the pressure, control distance, then finish

03:26–03:29 · Scored

5:4

Evidence frame

In an actual report, this area shows a frame from the corresponding bout video.

Each frame corresponds to this action's timestamp and analysis.

What happened

B begins sustained forward pressure. A retreats early to maintain distance, makes B's first attack fall short, then hits before B recovers. A scores a single light.

Technical interpretation

The early retreat avoids the reactive close-distance defence seen in action 2. A's reply lands during B's recovery.

Keep or adjust

Practise early retreat, recognition of the miss, and immediate reply as one sequence.

Opponent tendencies observed in this video

Observation A

Sustained pressure compresses the second retreat

B continues pressing and challenges A's second retreat. Opening distance earlier can change this situation.

Actions 2 and 7 →

Observation B

Keeping the point in line against direct entries

When A enters without addressing the point, B has a double-touch opportunity. Changing the line first produces a different result.

Actions 3 and 4 →

Observation C

Counterattacking the extra pursuit step

When A adds a step after the first window, B attacks the forward weight shift. The small sample does not establish a fixed habit.

Action 5 →

Tactical decision tree for this opponent

After a half-step probe, read the opponent's response

The point stays in line

Control the blade, then finish

Avoid entering directly along the threatened line.

See action 4 ↗

The opponent keeps pressing

Retreat early and look for the miss

If space is limited, change your defensive choice promptly.

See action 7 ↗

The first attacking window closes

Recover distance instead of chasing

Do not substitute an extra preparation step for a fresh decision.

See action 5 ↗

Athlete performance profile for this video

Put individual actions in context: which strengths appear, and which areas remain inconsistent?

These illustrative scores demonstrate the layout. They are neither a real assessment nor a longitudinal profile.

Illustrative bout performance

Preparationlow

70n=7

Distance managementlow

55n=7

Blade controllow

60n=7

Finish selectionlow

65n=7

Single-light conversionlow

55n=7

Defensive recoverylow

50n=7

Score managementlow

50n=7

Tactical adaptabilitylow

65n=7

Different technical areas can show different patterns in the same bout.

Preparation70 / 100

Actions 1 and 4: probing establishes a trigger to attack.

Distance management55 / 100

Actions 2 and 7: early and late retreats lead to different outcomes.

Blade control60 / 100

Actions 3 and 4: addressing the point in line changes the outcome.

Finish selection65 / 100

Action 5: preparation continues after the finishing window closes.

Single-light conversion55 / 100

Three single lights and two doubles: single-light conditions need greater consistency.

Defensive recovery50 / 100

Actions 2 and 5: recovery is limited after compression or pursuit.

Score management50 / 100

This short example cannot establish how a lead is managed in a longer bout.

Tactical adaptability65 / 100

Actions 4 and 7: adjustments respond to distance and point position.

Evidence-supported findings

Prioritise the timing of decisions, not simply faster pursuit.

Actions 2 and 5 concede after late decisions. Actions 4 and 7 score single lights after earlier responses to the point or distance. This example therefore prioritises recognising conditions, choosing promptly, and finishing or exiting—not a general instruction to move faster.

This is a synthesis within a fictional example, not experimentally established causation or a conclusion about other bouts.

Training tasks

Task 01 · Actions 3 and 4

Two choices against the point in line

The partner randomly keeps the point in line or takes it off line. After a half-step probe, control an in-line blade or finish directly against an off-line point. Recover distance if the window closes.

Success criteria

Complete 20 randomised repetitions, correctly recognising and completing the chosen branch in at least 14. A coach records the decisions and outcomes.

Task 02 · Actions 2 and 7

Retreat and reply under sustained pressure

The partner randomly uses one advance or sustained pressure. After the first retreat, promptly choose more distance or a different defence, then reply after recognising the miss.

Success criteria

Complete 20 repetitions, making a decision before close distance develops in at least 14. Record whether the retreat, defensive change and reply are completed.

Evidence limits

This is a fictional public example. Athletes, scores, timestamps, actions, ratings and training targets are illustrative. Evidence areas are placeholders, not real video frames. This is not a human-reviewed customer report.

Actual reports address actions that can be identified in the uploaded footage. Obscured blade contact, uncertain decisions and missing footage are marked explicitly. Short clips are not used to infer mental state, overall ability or long-term development.